I thought that the development and social assistance to one determined group of citizens that needs such and that, in turn, paid its taxes, were to have of the power publish that, in first place, it represents such needed groups together with the ones that they do not need assistance, group such that agrees that the first cited group necessary and must be helped? such thought of agreement can be proven if to observe the collected amount of existing givers in programs of the sort of collection and values. as this responsibility to help the needed ones is being attributed the common population for the private capital, would not obligatorily start to be responsibility of the power publishes since, the proper one to be able represents the population in general? Since this is happening, why it has the necessity to exist a National bank for Desenvolvimento Social (BNDS)? Therefore, from the moment that the private capital assumes a responsibility that, for obligation, is of the government, the responsible governmental area if it shows inefficient, imcompetent person or completely useless. It has a tenuous difference enters the application of the private aid to improve the power I publish destined to the social development, that in this example, is in a good platform, in this premise the aid private if it becomes a good thing. Already in one another condition, where the social development for the part publishes leaves to desire, the necessity of aid on the part of the private capital does not have to be seen as something ' ' bom' ' , therefore it is not, to be ' ' bom' ' it must not have the incapacity of the state power in first place. The necessity of the private power to be able itself to keep the programs of social development being that the State does not obtain it completely, is not something ' ' bom' ' , something is preoccupying. .