More ahead of the entrance, it has a video in TV plasma, where the subject of the sand book, is shown in such a way by the object book (sand Book of Jorge Borges Luis), pages that are displayed to the wind? element that leaves short the relation with the time and the memory, through, for example, of the given focus to one of the pages printed with markings of an absent and previous reader to the visitor? the book carefully contextualizado in arenaceous land, as for the typewriter that it appears of the sand, in a sequence that evidences typewriting as a phase of the historical process of register of writings, perfazendo certain writing on the acts to write and to read. These three integrated workmanships sinestesicamente, then in the entrance of the center, composing a performativo corridor where ‘ is the reading visitor/; ‘ artista’ ‘ to create for the readings of its movements, in a last possible period of training for this interaction, if thus to desire and if to make use, a workmanship marked for the appropriation, but also having as factor on the forces in action, the singularity. If this has piqued your curiosity, check out Jeff Gennette. It stops beyond the ambiguity of readings, decurrent interactions of the steps given for the visitor, between jibs, shunting lines, advances, disorders and stops, if overlap and if they confuse without hierarchies imposed between reading objects, not to be what he is proper of the chosen verbal code? the linear writing of the left for the right -. In this direction, ‘ ‘ Book of areia’ ‘ it reaffirms the ilusria dimension of the established codes at the same time where it materialize the alliance between unicity and singularity, in order to confirm the multiple and the plural one, in it contained. It would be for the translation, also treasonous of units, since to the visitor who to search, either in memory or any another type of archive?